Last time I wrote about the Argento Ensemble, they were taking their audience on a tour of contemporary French composers. On January 31st at Merkin, they extended their range a century and moved a bit northwest. This new program, entitled “Expressionism in Motion,” traced the legacy of Austro-Germanic Expressionism from Wagner and Schoenberg through Stockhausen to Wolfgang Rihm and Georg Friedrich Haas.

Interestingly, Argento chose not to present the works in order of age. Rather, they arranged the pieces in order of increasing instrumental forces. The concert, then, began in the chronological middle with Stockhausen’s “Der Kleine Harlekin” from 1975. “Der Kleine Harlekin,” for solo clarinet, is one of Stockhausen’s dance pieces, and it’s extracted from his larger work Harlekin. I’ve seen several of these dance pieces in score form, but never in performance. On that basis, I was intrigued, but a little worried, to see “Kleine Harlekin” on the bill. On the page, it’s hard not to suspect that Stockhausen’s eccentricity pushes these works over the top. Fortunately, clarinetist Carol McGonnell offered me some immediate reassurance by forsaking the mutli-colored unitards that Stockhausen’s preferred clarinetist, Suzanne Stephens, favors. My initial impression held true once the music started; the work and its performance proved delightful. The motions that Stockhausen calls for cleverly (and often humorously) inflect the equally playful, almost jazzy clarinet lines. About halfway through the piece I discovered that the visual elements had moved to the foreground for me (in a good way). My only complaint is that Argento presented the work in one of its alternate versions – with a drum accompanying the clarinet. The drum obscured many of the sounds of McGonnell’s footsteps, which, as Stockhausen points out in his notes, are central to the piece. In fact, I believe that in Stockhausen’s proposed alternate version the drum is included in lieu of the clarinetist’s dancing (I hope Argento and McGonnell will forgive me if that’s wrong).

After “Der Kleine Harlekin,” Argento departed briefly from the evening’s theme. January 31st also marked the release of Argento’s first CD, Winter Fragments – a selection of pieces by Tristan Murail. To mark the occasion, they inserted Murail’s “Feuilles à travers les cloches” for flute, violin, cello, and piano. The piece is a something of a spectral etude. It dwells for its duration on a bell-like sound produced by resonant piano chords and violin pizzicato with the flute and cello responding to each toll. Its most significant developments are a jump from the piano’s highest register to its lowest followed shortly by a return the high keys. In its stillness, the piece contrasted richly with the titular “motion” of the rest of the program. Look for a review of Winter Fragments soon.

Argento makes a point of championing living European composers, and the next two works furthered that agenda. The ensemble offered the U.S. premieres of Georg Friedrich Haas’ “Nach Ruf…ent-gleitend…” and Wolfgang Rihm’s “Chiffre VI.” Both works deserve repeated performances. The Haas, for wind and string sextet, came first and transitioned nicely out of the Murail by opening with high, clustered microtones. However, the clusters soon fell to the background as the viola entered with a line that, though also microtonal, drank deeply from Romantic waters. This entrance signaled things to come as microtones calmed into just-intonation harmonies. The microtones and skillful orchestration made for a rich, undulating music that was pierced by some moments of particular urgency.

Rihm’s “Chiffre VI” came next. In the work, Rihm pits two violins, viola, and cello in sonic struggle against clarinet, contrabassoon, and horn with the contrabass acting as a double agent. The piece is fierce and ferocious, and, for my money, it conjured up Expressionism more clearly than anything else on the bill. “Chiffre VI” lasts only five or six minutes, but it manages to both fly by and feel like it must’ve been much longer. I’m looking forward to tracking down the other seven pieces of the cycle.

After intermission, Argento presented the program’s two oldest and largest pieces. First came Wagner’s “Vorspiel und Liebestod” from Tristan und Isolde as arranged for 15 instruments by Argento’s multi-talented general manager, Kimmy Szeto. Reducing the forces of such a war horse is always a risk, but Szeto and Argento made it work. As the program notes suggested, the chamber orchestra arrangement did highlight the intimacy of the piece. Individual lines really sung, and only in a few, fleeting passages did I miss the full orchestra.

The 15-instrument arrangement of the “Vorspiel und Liebestod” matched its forces with the next piece, Schoenberg’s “Kammersymmphonie No. 1” (presented in its original form). This piece (with which Schoenberg may have coined the ‘Chamber Symphony’ designation) paints a picture of a composer in transition. Though tonal in the long term, Schoenberg undercuts the E-major tonality with whole-tone elements, augmented triads, and quartal harmonies. Schoenberg is clearly straining against both traditional harmony and Wagner’s extension of it. The roots of Expressionism, if not its flowers, are visible here. Argento, again, performed the work skillfully; even its thorniest moments retained a satisfying openness.

All-in-all, the night was another well-performed and well-programmed concert by Argento. For those of you in L.A. the program will be repeated at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art on February 15th at 8:00. And keep an eye out for my review of Argento’s new CD on the Reviews page soon.

7 Responses to “Expressionism: Still Kickin’”
  1. Jacob Sudol says:

    I also remember seeing that Stockhausen piece in Aspen a few years ago. In the notes it said that it could be for hidden percussionist, which is how they performed it. My favourite part in that performance is where she plays a high note and runs out of the hall and then back in.

  2. Jacob Sudol says:

    One of Haas’ best pieces is the 70-some minute “In Vain” for a small orchestra (30 some instrument). The SMCQ played it live in Montreal a little over a year ago. It’s really great piece that I’ve been meaning to excerpt and post but haven’t got around to it yet.

  3. Steve Smith says:

    Thanks, Steve, I’ll be grabbing that piece tomorrow.

  4. Steve Layton says:

    Haas’ big orchestra piece, natures mortes, recently showed up on Emusic (so maybe iTunes as well), on a Col Legno compilation of works from the 2003 Donauschingen Musiktage:

    It’s a real heterophony-fest; starts off almost intolerably bombastic and clunky, but keeps pushing through into ever more rarefied territory, and in the end more than won me over.

  5. Steve Smith says:

    Lanier, terrific review of a really special event. I’ll second the recommendation of the CPO Rihm cycle, and I’m with you: I want to hear the Haas piece again, and I want to hear more of his work.

  6. Lanier Sammons says:

    Just in case there are any doubts, I in no way meant to imply that the drum in “Kleine Harlekin” was being used to cover any deficiencies in Ms. McGonnell’s performance. She clearly has the chops (clarinet- and foot-based) to pull off the piece, and she’s done the piece in its original version several times before to plenty of critical acclaim.

    Nathan – thanks for the recommendation on the Chiffre-Zyklus CD. I’ll be checking that out.

  7. Nathan Brock says:

    There’s a recording of the entire Chiffre-Zyklus on CPO with musikFabrik playing. It actually consists of ten pieces – the eight “chiffre”s, a piece entitled Bild (eine Chiffre) and another called Nach-Schrift (eine Chiffre). It’s a pretty good recording, though I haven’t seen the scores or heard other performances of the works. Seems to have good energy, and clear commitment from the players.