<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You Can Trust Your Car to the Man Who Wears a Star</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sequenza21.com/2008/02/you-can-trust-your-car-to-the-man-who-wears-a-star/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sequenza21.com/2008/02/you-can-trust-your-car-to-the-man-who-wears-a-star/</link>
	<description>The Contemporary Classical Music Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:29:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael McDonagh</title>
		<link>http://www.sequenza21.com/2008/02/you-can-trust-your-car-to-the-man-who-wears-a-star/comment-page-1/#comment-13938</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael McDonagh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sequenza21.com/index.php/714#comment-13938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pls forgive . Should have been -- &quot; The Stephen Sondheim of his time. &quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pls forgive . Should have been &#8212; &#8221; The Stephen Sondheim of his time. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael McDonagh</title>
		<link>http://www.sequenza21.com/2008/02/you-can-trust-your-car-to-the-man-who-wears-a-star/comment-page-1/#comment-13931</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael McDonagh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sequenza21.com/index.php/714#comment-13931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am. Balanchine was great, but over-rated. The Stephen Sondheim of our time. Sorry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am. Balanchine was great, but over-rated. The Stephen Sondheim of our time. Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen R.</title>
		<link>http://www.sequenza21.com/2008/02/you-can-trust-your-car-to-the-man-who-wears-a-star/comment-page-1/#comment-13930</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sequenza21.com/index.php/714#comment-13930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Would that Balanchine’s 1967 mostly general dance, Diamonds, from Jewels, were as successful or interesting as the two dances which preceded it.&quot;

You can&#039;t be serious.  My jaw is dropping.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Would that Balanchine’s 1967 mostly general dance, Diamonds, from Jewels, were as successful or interesting as the two dances which preceded it.&#8221;</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t be serious.  My jaw is dropping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael McDonagh</title>
		<link>http://www.sequenza21.com/2008/02/you-can-trust-your-car-to-the-man-who-wears-a-star/comment-page-1/#comment-13916</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael McDonagh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sequenza21.com/index.php/714#comment-13916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Andrew Thanks for your thoughtful comments. Though &quot;Diamonds&quot; was obviously an apotheosis of classicism in ballet, it seemed to belabor its points ( pointes ? ), and went on far too long. But Tchaikovsky is always a pleasure. Thomson&#039;s music was always unique, and far more original than Copland&#039;s, which is school of Stravinsky if you will, while his is school of Satie. Filling Station was, according to Virgil Thomson by Virgil Thomson, big hit in his lifetime, though I think you&#039;re right in saying that it&#039;s infrequently performed now. And this revival -- my first enocunter with it -- seemed to do it proud.   All thanks agin.   Michael McDonagh]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Andrew Thanks for your thoughtful comments. Though &#8220;Diamonds&#8221; was obviously an apotheosis of classicism in ballet, it seemed to belabor its points ( pointes ? ), and went on far too long. But Tchaikovsky is always a pleasure. Thomson&#8217;s music was always unique, and far more original than Copland&#8217;s, which is school of Stravinsky if you will, while his is school of Satie. Filling Station was, according to Virgil Thomson by Virgil Thomson, big hit in his lifetime, though I think you&#8217;re right in saying that it&#8217;s infrequently performed now. And this revival &#8212; my first enocunter with it &#8212; seemed to do it proud.   All thanks agin.   Michael McDonagh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.sequenza21.com/2008/02/you-can-trust-your-car-to-the-man-who-wears-a-star/comment-page-1/#comment-13910</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sequenza21.com/index.php/714#comment-13910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps there was something wrong with the &quot;Diamonds&quot; performance?

The ballet itself is a miracle, a complex and multi-faceted exploration of classicism in ballet.  It is one of Balanchine&#039;s very greatest works, capturing his inspiration in peak form.  It can be watched endlessly.

At NYCB, even when it is clear that the dancers are under-rehearsed, &quot;Diamonds&quot; always makes an overwhelming impact.

Two or three or four years ago, I attended a staging of &quot;Filling Station&quot;, conducted by David Alan Miller.  I cannot recall whether the performance was in Minneapolis or Baltimore (I am at the office, and cannot consult old programs).  However, it was immediately apparent why &quot;Filling Station&quot; is seldom staged now.  It will always remain a curiosity, not a repertory work.

However, Aaron Copland was clearly familiar with the score for &quot;Filling Station&quot;, and used it as a model for his own &quot;Americana&quot; ballets (to the point of grand larceny, as Thomson himself was always keen to point out).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps there was something wrong with the &#8220;Diamonds&#8221; performance?</p>
<p>The ballet itself is a miracle, a complex and multi-faceted exploration of classicism in ballet.  It is one of Balanchine&#8217;s very greatest works, capturing his inspiration in peak form.  It can be watched endlessly.</p>
<p>At NYCB, even when it is clear that the dancers are under-rehearsed, &#8220;Diamonds&#8221; always makes an overwhelming impact.</p>
<p>Two or three or four years ago, I attended a staging of &#8220;Filling Station&#8221;, conducted by David Alan Miller.  I cannot recall whether the performance was in Minneapolis or Baltimore (I am at the office, and cannot consult old programs).  However, it was immediately apparent why &#8220;Filling Station&#8221; is seldom staged now.  It will always remain a curiosity, not a repertory work.</p>
<p>However, Aaron Copland was clearly familiar with the score for &#8220;Filling Station&#8221;, and used it as a model for his own &#8220;Americana&#8221; ballets (to the point of grand larceny, as Thomson himself was always keen to point out).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
