<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Right Kind of Advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sequenza21.com/2008/06/the-right-kind-of-advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sequenza21.com/2008/06/the-right-kind-of-advertising/</link>
	<description>The Contemporary Classical Music Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:38:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Fried</title>
		<link>http://www.sequenza21.com/2008/06/the-right-kind-of-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-14437</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Fried</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sequenza21.com/?p=829#comment-14437</guid>
		<description>It is perhaps hard to understand conclusions developed from aggregate statistics, used for a specific case, in this case &quot;contemporary music.&quot;  Of course it would be no surprise if our definitions of contemporary music differ, and in the extreme at that.

I could be wrong but besides the  production, spectacle, stars, etc. I thought people go to the opera for the voice, the emotions, and the music/drama.  

Unless these content issues are addressed your going to need a lot of advertising.

Phil Fried</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is perhaps hard to understand conclusions developed from aggregate statistics, used for a specific case, in this case &#8220;contemporary music.&#8221;  Of course it would be no surprise if our definitions of contemporary music differ, and in the extreme at that.</p>
<p>I could be wrong but besides the  production, spectacle, stars, etc. I thought people go to the opera for the voice, the emotions, and the music/drama.  </p>
<p>Unless these content issues are addressed your going to need a lot of advertising.</p>
<p>Phil Fried</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeno</title>
		<link>http://www.sequenza21.com/2008/06/the-right-kind-of-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-14436</link>
		<dc:creator>zeno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sequenza21.com/?p=829#comment-14436</guid>
		<description>For the new opera scene to flourish, at least in San Francisco, has required a group of committed donors -- as well as the Grants for the Arts/San Francisco Hotel Tax Fund-- who believe in new opera and who are willing to donate millions of dollars toward new opera commissioning over dozens of years.  Bernard and Barbro Osher and others have donated significant amounts to the San Francisco Opera provided the funding go to the commissioning of new operatic works.  Hence, the almost biennial [or better] commissioning of new operas by that progressive and wealthy opera company.   [Interestingly, the recent world premiere, in London, of Birtwistle&#039;s &#039;The Minotaur&#039; was funded, in part, by the Columbia Foundation of San Francisco, using tax-preferred funding under U.S. tax law.  It remains to be seen whether the work will also be staged by the San Francisco Opera, the Metropolitan Opera, the Seattle Opera, the Chicago Lyric Opera ...   Also, interesting, at least to me, is that San Francisco venture capitalist Michael Moritz, and his wife Harriet Heyman, last Wednesday gave $50 million to Oxford University in appreciation for the history and humanities instruction Mr Moritz received at Christ Church College in the 1970s.]

The Washington, D.C. region, unfortunately, lacks major cultural patrons willing to donate tax-preferred funding to the Washington NATIONAL Opera for purposes of new operas.  Thus, it was unusual when, a few years back, the Washington Opera petitioned Congress for permission to rename itself the Washington NATIONAL Opera, in exchange for its explicit promise -- now held in balance since the company has announced no American opera for next season, and some Board members are reported to be clammoring to abrogate the promise to Congress  -- to produce one American opera each and every season. [That was a promise to produce 10 American operas every decade; 100 every century...]

I recall that the MET Opera still receives major funding from the Texas-based Don and Sybil B. Harrington Foundation, which is made with the provision that the funding support traditional productions and no modern or new operas.  Ms. Harrington, who passed away a decade ago, provided underwriting support for the exemplary, though conservative, Met productions -- almost all televised -- of &#039;&#039;Don Carlo,&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Manon Lescaut,&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;La Boheme,&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Francesca da Rimini,&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Die Fledermaus,&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Turandot,&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Das Rheingold,&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Aida,&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Don Giovanni,&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;La Fanciulla del West,&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Die Meistersinger von Nuernberg&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;Otello.&#039;&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the new opera scene to flourish, at least in San Francisco, has required a group of committed donors &#8212; as well as the Grants for the Arts/San Francisco Hotel Tax Fund&#8211; who believe in new opera and who are willing to donate millions of dollars toward new opera commissioning over dozens of years.  Bernard and Barbro Osher and others have donated significant amounts to the San Francisco Opera provided the funding go to the commissioning of new operatic works.  Hence, the almost biennial [or better] commissioning of new operas by that progressive and wealthy opera company.   [Interestingly, the recent world premiere, in London, of Birtwistle's 'The Minotaur' was funded, in part, by the Columbia Foundation of San Francisco, using tax-preferred funding under U.S. tax law.  It remains to be seen whether the work will also be staged by the San Francisco Opera, the Metropolitan Opera, the Seattle Opera, the Chicago Lyric Opera ...   Also, interesting, at least to me, is that San Francisco venture capitalist Michael Moritz, and his wife Harriet Heyman, last Wednesday gave $50 million to Oxford University in appreciation for the history and humanities instruction Mr Moritz received at Christ Church College in the 1970s.]</p>
<p>The Washington, D.C. region, unfortunately, lacks major cultural patrons willing to donate tax-preferred funding to the Washington NATIONAL Opera for purposes of new operas.  Thus, it was unusual when, a few years back, the Washington Opera petitioned Congress for permission to rename itself the Washington NATIONAL Opera, in exchange for its explicit promise &#8212; now held in balance since the company has announced no American opera for next season, and some Board members are reported to be clammoring to abrogate the promise to Congress  &#8212; to produce one American opera each and every season. [That was a promise to produce 10 American operas every decade; 100 every century...]</p>
<p>I recall that the MET Opera still receives major funding from the Texas-based Don and Sybil B. Harrington Foundation, which is made with the provision that the funding support traditional productions and no modern or new operas.  Ms. Harrington, who passed away a decade ago, provided underwriting support for the exemplary, though conservative, Met productions &#8212; almost all televised &#8212; of &#8221;Don Carlo,&#8221; &#8221;Manon Lescaut,&#8221; &#8221;La Boheme,&#8221; &#8221;Francesca da Rimini,&#8221; &#8221;Die Fledermaus,&#8221; &#8221;Turandot,&#8221; &#8221;Das Rheingold,&#8221; &#8221;Aida,&#8221; &#8221;Don Giovanni,&#8221; &#8221;La Fanciulla del West,&#8221; &#8221;Die Meistersinger von Nuernberg&#8221; and &#8221;Otello.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.sequenza21.com/2008/06/the-right-kind-of-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-14434</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sequenza21.com/?p=829#comment-14434</guid>
		<description>Yes, but... 1) It is expensive to pull together a unique audience for each concert 2) casual or occasional audience members are unlikely to turn into donors.  For the new music scene to flourish, at least here in Boston, we need a group of committed supporters who will give far more than the price of the ticket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but&#8230; 1) It is expensive to pull together a unique audience for each concert 2) casual or occasional audience members are unlikely to turn into donors.  For the new music scene to flourish, at least here in Boston, we need a group of committed supporters who will give far more than the price of the ticket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.sequenza21.com/2008/06/the-right-kind-of-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-14428</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sequenza21.com/?p=829#comment-14428</guid>
		<description>I was delighted to read about the niche-marketing focus for Satyagraha. I very much appreciate the Met&#039;s content-specific focus that relied upon making connections with specific audiences and did not try the tried but ineffective strategy of pushing &quot;the opera harder to the existing audience base.&quot;

This content-specific marketing strategy would be ideal, I believe, for many dance companies.  Too often dance is promoted to traditional dance audiences. Little or no effort is devoted to what I&#039;ll call the Sanskrit question: With whom would this work resonate whether or not they had seen much, little or any dance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was delighted to read about the niche-marketing focus for Satyagraha. I very much appreciate the Met&#8217;s content-specific focus that relied upon making connections with specific audiences and did not try the tried but ineffective strategy of pushing &#8220;the opera harder to the existing audience base.&#8221;</p>
<p>This content-specific marketing strategy would be ideal, I believe, for many dance companies.  Too often dance is promoted to traditional dance audiences. Little or no effort is devoted to what I&#8217;ll call the Sanskrit question: With whom would this work resonate whether or not they had seen much, little or any dance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeno</title>
		<link>http://www.sequenza21.com/2008/06/the-right-kind-of-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-14427</link>
		<dc:creator>zeno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sequenza21.com/?p=829#comment-14427</guid>
		<description>&quot;Apparently, prior to Gelb’s arrival the Met had no marketing team–marketing wasn’t seen as necessary with the number of sold-out performances they were playing. But in 2002, after years of steadily running at around 92% box office capacity [annualized], box office collapsed to 82% ...&quot;

I recall that the March 2002 revival of Alban Berg&#039;s Lulu -- with Christine Schafer in the title role -- was not well attended.  And there was the earlier production of Benjamin Britten&#039;s Death in Venice -- I can&#039;t recall the season off-hand -- that was not well promoted or attended.

I&#039;d also be curious as to whether Samuel Ramey&#039;s and Jessye Norman&#039;s names assured respectable-sized crowds for the double-bill of Bartok&#039;s Bluebeard&#039;s Castle and Schoenberg&#039;s Erwartung in 1989.  I vaguely recall that at one point Peter Sellars was slated for this evening, and that it originally was to have closed with Dallapiccola&#039;s Il Prigioniero.  [I was unfortunately too preoccupied, and had already attended the NYCO&#039;s stunning Achim Freyer Bonn Opera production of Moses und Aron, to have attended in person the MET premiere of that work, under today&#039;s birthday boy James Levine.]

*

Will the Gelb [and Maazel] eras see MET Opera premieres of such operas as Dallapiccola&#039;s Ulisse, Sessions&#039;s Montezuma, Messiaen&#039;s Saint-Francois d&#039;Assis, Saariaho&#039;s L&#039;amour de Loin, Birtwistle&#039;s The Minotaur, and Wallace&#039;s The Bonesetter&#039;s Daughter -- as well as Shostakovich&#039;s The Nose and Janacek&#039;s From the House of the Dead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Apparently, prior to Gelb’s arrival the Met had no marketing team–marketing wasn’t seen as necessary with the number of sold-out performances they were playing. But in 2002, after years of steadily running at around 92% box office capacity [annualized], box office collapsed to 82% &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I recall that the March 2002 revival of Alban Berg&#8217;s Lulu &#8212; with Christine Schafer in the title role &#8212; was not well attended.  And there was the earlier production of Benjamin Britten&#8217;s Death in Venice &#8212; I can&#8217;t recall the season off-hand &#8212; that was not well promoted or attended.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also be curious as to whether Samuel Ramey&#8217;s and Jessye Norman&#8217;s names assured respectable-sized crowds for the double-bill of Bartok&#8217;s Bluebeard&#8217;s Castle and Schoenberg&#8217;s Erwartung in 1989.  I vaguely recall that at one point Peter Sellars was slated for this evening, and that it originally was to have closed with Dallapiccola&#8217;s Il Prigioniero.  [I was unfortunately too preoccupied, and had already attended the NYCO's stunning Achim Freyer Bonn Opera production of Moses und Aron, to have attended in person the MET premiere of that work, under today's birthday boy James Levine.]</p>
<p>*</p>
<p>Will the Gelb [and Maazel] eras see MET Opera premieres of such operas as Dallapiccola&#8217;s Ulisse, Sessions&#8217;s Montezuma, Messiaen&#8217;s Saint-Francois d&#8217;Assis, Saariaho&#8217;s L&#8217;amour de Loin, Birtwistle&#8217;s The Minotaur, and Wallace&#8217;s The Bonesetter&#8217;s Daughter &#8212; as well as Shostakovich&#8217;s The Nose and Janacek&#8217;s From the House of the Dead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.C. Combs</title>
		<link>http://www.sequenza21.com/2008/06/the-right-kind-of-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-14426</link>
		<dc:creator>J.C. Combs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sequenza21.com/?p=829#comment-14426</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been trying to point that out as much as possible lately.  There is an audience there for new music, yet trying to market it to an audience longing for the really old sound and scoffing at different ideas won&#039;t work.  But who wants them anyway?  And as that article points out, there are free thinking people out there, lots of them, ready to experience new and current works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been trying to point that out as much as possible lately.  There is an audience there for new music, yet trying to market it to an audience longing for the really old sound and scoffing at different ideas won&#8217;t work.  But who wants them anyway?  And as that article points out, there are free thinking people out there, lots of them, ready to experience new and current works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

