Jerry,

Wanted to make sure this didn’t get by you:

Tomorrow (Ed:  now tonight) the Contemporary Museum’s Mobtown Modern music series will be  presenting the complete Rite of Spring arranged for modern big band. The 7:30pm set will be livestreamed online by Radar Redux (http://www.radarredux.com/live/) so all can attend, even those not in Baltimore! More info at http://mobtownmodern.com

Best wishes,
Brian Sacawa
Curator, Mobtown Modern Music Series
Contemporary Museum

12 Responses to “Rite of Spring for Big Band. Solid.”
  1. bgn says:

    Well, you must admit, a big band arrangement would be more practical for a ballet company than Stravinsky’s original humongous orchestra…

  2. Chris Becker says:

    I think they both transcended any and all labels (especially “jazz”) that are put upon what is just great music.

  3. paul bailey says:

    of course…

    i think it’s safe to say that ellington and stravinsky each made better works in their own art and jazz mediums

  4. Chris Becker says:

    “…which interestingly enough he was cribbing from Stravinsky.”

    And Stravinsky wasn’t “cribbing” anything from jazz? You’ve heard Ebony Concerto, right?

  5. paul bailey says:

    as an arrangement, i’m not sure you add anything by having a ride symbol behind it, it reminds me of the 4/4 arrangement of dave brubek’s “take 5″ and having solos makes it sound more like a parody of one of ellington’s chamber works (which interestingly enough he was cribbing from stravinsky)

    on one hand music shouldn’t be painstakingly preserved in an airless glass tomb, but listening to a big band play stravinsky is like watching monty python putting on the coronation of poppea.

    it all sounds interesting on paper, but…

  6. Steve Layton says:

    Interesting point, Mark (though you sound a little like you got up on the wrong side of the bed today…). Just how sacrosant are the composer’s “intentions” anyway, and for how long? Seems there’s a point where other people’s intentions can come into play as well, often to interesting effect. The tradition of re-arranging and even re-styling composers’ works has a pretty long and respected tradition, too. The idea of the composer’s score being “set in stone” is fairly recent.

  7. Mark B says:

    What a pointless activity. Stravinksy would be turning in his grave. I’m sure if it was intended for a “big band” he would have arranged it so. More like the “Shite” of Spring

  8. Man, Brian, I am kicking myself for not being able to make this concert. I’ve been meaning to make a Mobtown Modern event for some time but I’m in Baltimore in the mornings, primarily, and don’t stay or head back. Next season I’ll have to come check you guys out. I hope the concert rocked tonight.

  9. Steve Layton says:

    Of course for a couple other takes on it, there’s Fireworks:

    http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/fireworksmusic04

    And the even more daunting version by John Ringer, for basically a power trio:

    http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/stravinsky

  10. Chris Becker says:

    I’ll listen and follow along with my Dover score! That’s a bear of a piece to try and arrange for alternate instrumentation!

    P.S. Burnt Sugar has a CD called the Rites with Butch Morris conducting that also uses themes from The Rite to realize a conduction for a large band of electric guitars, strings, piano, turntables, etc.

  11. Brian says:

    @Jean-Francois Actually, it’s much different with the main difference being that Sebesky simply took themes from the original to work into a 6-min “chart.” The arrangement Mobtown Modern presents tonight is of the entire score.

  12. Would be good to compare to Don Sebesky’s jazz arrangement.

  13.