<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Apple doesn&#8217;t fall far from the Timber</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sequenza21.com/2011/08/the-apple-doesnt-fall-far-from-the-timber/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sequenza21.com/2011/08/the-apple-doesnt-fall-far-from-the-timber/</link>
	<description>The Contemporary Classical Music Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:02:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garrett Schumann</title>
		<link>http://www.sequenza21.com/2011/08/the-apple-doesnt-fall-far-from-the-timber/comment-page-1/#comment-26088</link>
		<dc:creator>Garrett Schumann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sequenza21.com/?p=6063#comment-26088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following is such a stereotypically confrontational &quot;internet comment&quot;, but I really can&#039;t help myself:

I was a little disappointed in Mr. Gordon when he presented &quot;Timber&quot; in a master class at UMich and said he didn&#039;t care about the type of wood used the the performers.

To me, the coolest thing about the piece is the individual wood pieces&#039; overtones, which vary greatly depending on the hardness/softness of the given lumber.

As a listener, this element of the music (again, the overtones of the wood) made the piece work for me, and I didn&#039;t appreciate Mr. Gordon&#039;s indifference, though I suppose it made sense once he admitted that he didn&#039;t - at all - conceive of the wood&#039;s overtones as a factor in the music.

In the interest of full disclosure, I only care about this because of a Piano Technology class I took which taught me to appreciate the role of instrumental materials more than ever. Had I not taken the class, two things would be true: 1. I definitely wouldn&#039;t be such a &quot;lumber snob&quot; 2. I probably wouldn&#039;t have had as strong a reaction to the accidentally intriguing and brilliant sound of the wood.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following is such a stereotypically confrontational &#8220;internet comment&#8221;, but I really can&#8217;t help myself:</p>
<p>I was a little disappointed in Mr. Gordon when he presented &#8220;Timber&#8221; in a master class at UMich and said he didn&#8217;t care about the type of wood used the the performers.</p>
<p>To me, the coolest thing about the piece is the individual wood pieces&#8217; overtones, which vary greatly depending on the hardness/softness of the given lumber.</p>
<p>As a listener, this element of the music (again, the overtones of the wood) made the piece work for me, and I didn&#8217;t appreciate Mr. Gordon&#8217;s indifference, though I suppose it made sense once he admitted that he didn&#8217;t &#8211; at all &#8211; conceive of the wood&#8217;s overtones as a factor in the music.</p>
<p>In the interest of full disclosure, I only care about this because of a Piano Technology class I took which taught me to appreciate the role of instrumental materials more than ever. Had I not taken the class, two things would be true: 1. I definitely wouldn&#8217;t be such a &#8220;lumber snob&#8221; 2. I probably wouldn&#8217;t have had as strong a reaction to the accidentally intriguing and brilliant sound of the wood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
