<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pianist Nikolai Lugansky weathers the storm of Rachmaninoff&#8217;s 3rd.Piano Concerto</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sequenza21.com/2012/11/pianist-nikolai-lugansky-weathers-the-storm-of-rachmaninoffs-3rd-piano-concerto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sequenza21.com/2012/11/pianist-nikolai-lugansky-weathers-the-storm-of-rachmaninoffs-3rd-piano-concerto/</link>
	<description>The Contemporary Classical Music Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:29:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Sidore</title>
		<link>http://www.sequenza21.com/2012/11/pianist-nikolai-lugansky-weathers-the-storm-of-rachmaninoffs-3rd-piano-concerto/comment-page-1/#comment-28053</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Sidore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sequenza21.com/?p=8452#comment-28053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After I heard Lugansky&#039;s performance of Rachmaninoff&#039;s Piano Concerto No. 3 with the Boston Symphony Orchestra, I felt there was something missing. So I went back and listened to my CD of Vladimir Horowitz&#039;s Golden Jubilee performance with the NY Philharmonic on January 8, 1978. At 75, Horowitz had lost a tiny bit of his technical brilliance, but his interpretation was still simply incredible. 

I then went to the WGBH classical music site and listened again to Lugansky&#039;s performance. By comparison to the Horowitz performance, Lugansky&#039;s was empty--devoid of feeling and interpretation. He seemed to give each note the same weight, where Horowitz emphasized some and underplayed others. Lugansky&#039;s timing, too, was overly mechanical, as if he still felt compelled to match a metronome exactly. I felt he played the notes, but not the music.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After I heard Lugansky&#8217;s performance of Rachmaninoff&#8217;s Piano Concerto No. 3 with the Boston Symphony Orchestra, I felt there was something missing. So I went back and listened to my CD of Vladimir Horowitz&#8217;s Golden Jubilee performance with the NY Philharmonic on January 8, 1978. At 75, Horowitz had lost a tiny bit of his technical brilliance, but his interpretation was still simply incredible. </p>
<p>I then went to the WGBH classical music site and listened again to Lugansky&#8217;s performance. By comparison to the Horowitz performance, Lugansky&#8217;s was empty&#8211;devoid of feeling and interpretation. He seemed to give each note the same weight, where Horowitz emphasized some and underplayed others. Lugansky&#8217;s timing, too, was overly mechanical, as if he still felt compelled to match a metronome exactly. I felt he played the notes, but not the music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Svetlana Chlenova</title>
		<link>http://www.sequenza21.com/2012/11/pianist-nikolai-lugansky-weathers-the-storm-of-rachmaninoffs-3rd-piano-concerto/comment-page-1/#comment-27925</link>
		<dc:creator>Svetlana Chlenova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 23:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sequenza21.com/?p=8452#comment-27925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lot of thanks  to Ilona Oltuski for the remarkable review on Nikolai Lugansky’s  performance in Lincoln Center. Unlike some New York’s critics with their comments: “He was too fast!”, “It was too cold, too mechanic,” and “not luscious enough” Ilona Oltuski  presents the comprehensive  analysis on Lugansky’s playing and appreciates his balance of  genuine sincerity with reserve power]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of thanks  to Ilona Oltuski for the remarkable review on Nikolai Lugansky’s  performance in Lincoln Center. Unlike some New York’s critics with their comments: “He was too fast!”, “It was too cold, too mechanic,” and “not luscious enough” Ilona Oltuski  presents the comprehensive  analysis on Lugansky’s playing and appreciates his balance of  genuine sincerity with reserve power</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
