<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And now for something completely banal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sequenza21.com/forum/2007/04/and-now-for-something-completely-banal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sequenza21.com/forum/2007/04/and-now-for-something-completely-banal/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:09:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.D. Lake</title>
		<link>http://www.sequenza21.com/forum/2007/04/and-now-for-something-completely-banal/comment-page-1/#comment-5280</link>
		<dc:creator>T.D. Lake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 03:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sequenza21.com/forum/?p=37#comment-5280</guid>
		<description>Well, granted that we need to think of the audience that is voting, which Daniel says is British...

I got in a very heated argument with some people at a myspace classical music forum about Baroque music. As someone who is influence by the Baroque in my composition, (baroque intellectualism I&#039;ve heard it called) I tend to spend hours listening to Bach and Scarlatti keyboard works. Most people there said that they have &quot;no emotion,&quot; and that they prefer romantic composition.

My counterpoint was that Bach and Scarlatti are indeed dry, but they have a very high intensity level that never flags throughout a work, and while not flashy in dynamics and velocity, to me the works carry a lot of emotional weight. Enter &quot;baroque intellecualism.&quot;

Other than bad journalism... (Bach&#039;s works are seminal and he&#039;s not in Heaven disappointed about Classical FM&#039;s ratings of his work) I&#039;d say people just don&#039;t have an ear for Bach. I&#039;ve heard St. Matthew Passion described as &quot;boring&quot; and the keyboard works earn remarks like &quot;obscure,&quot; &quot;emotionless,&quot; and so on. To me it&#039;s some of the best music ever written.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, granted that we need to think of the audience that is voting, which Daniel says is British&#8230;</p>
<p>I got in a very heated argument with some people at a myspace classical music forum about Baroque music. As someone who is influence by the Baroque in my composition, (baroque intellectualism I&#8217;ve heard it called) I tend to spend hours listening to Bach and Scarlatti keyboard works. Most people there said that they have &#8220;no emotion,&#8221; and that they prefer romantic composition.</p>
<p>My counterpoint was that Bach and Scarlatti are indeed dry, but they have a very high intensity level that never flags throughout a work, and while not flashy in dynamics and velocity, to me the works carry a lot of emotional weight. Enter &#8220;baroque intellecualism.&#8221;</p>
<p>Other than bad journalism&#8230; (Bach&#8217;s works are seminal and he&#8217;s not in Heaven disappointed about Classical FM&#8217;s ratings of his work) I&#8217;d say people just don&#8217;t have an ear for Bach. I&#8217;ve heard St. Matthew Passion described as &#8220;boring&#8221; and the keyboard works earn remarks like &#8220;obscure,&#8221; &#8220;emotionless,&#8221; and so on. To me it&#8217;s some of the best music ever written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul H. Muller</title>
		<link>http://www.sequenza21.com/forum/2007/04/and-now-for-something-completely-banal/comment-page-1/#comment-5263</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul H. Muller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sequenza21.com/forum/?p=37#comment-5263</guid>
		<description>KUSC here in SoCal plays mostly secular works by Bach.  These are fine, if a bit overexposed, but you really meet the man in his sacred works.  Maybe this has something to do with the poll results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KUSC here in SoCal plays mostly secular works by Bach.  These are fine, if a bit overexposed, but you really meet the man in his sacred works.  Maybe this has something to do with the poll results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.sequenza21.com/forum/2007/04/and-now-for-something-completely-banal/comment-page-1/#comment-5257</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sequenza21.com/forum/?p=37#comment-5257</guid>
		<description>Classic FM is a British mag, so V-W and Elgar being top two doesn&#039;t surprise me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Classic FM is a British mag, so V-W and Elgar being top two doesn&#8217;t surprise me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

