<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s past is never really past</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sequenza21.com/forum/2009/09/114/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sequenza21.com/forum/2009/09/114/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 02:27:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: chris sahar</title>
		<link>http://www.sequenza21.com/forum/2009/09/114/comment-page-1/#comment-22851</link>
		<dc:creator>chris sahar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 02:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sequenza21.com/forum/?p=114#comment-22851</guid>
		<description>Haydn is the one composer I look up to and respect the most.  Especially as one who has come to composition late and is filling in deficiencies, I look to Haydn (oh and Ives) as models.    

TO get out from the shadow of Bach (CPE, et al ) and th 18th century Italian and French masters and do what he did under his circumstances - well, I think there is no match in at least the past several hundred years. 

Listeners and composers take for granted Haydn&#039;s innovations - partly because he pulled them off so well. 

Finally he gave so much to Mozart and Beethoven to perfect heir compositional abilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haydn is the one composer I look up to and respect the most.  Especially as one who has come to composition late and is filling in deficiencies, I look to Haydn (oh and Ives) as models.    </p>
<p>TO get out from the shadow of Bach (CPE, et al ) and th 18th century Italian and French masters and do what he did under his circumstances &#8211; well, I think there is no match in at least the past several hundred years. </p>
<p>Listeners and composers take for granted Haydn&#8217;s innovations &#8211; partly because he pulled them off so well. </p>
<p>Finally he gave so much to Mozart and Beethoven to perfect heir compositional abilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.sequenza21.com/forum/2009/09/114/comment-page-1/#comment-22849</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 02:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sequenza21.com/forum/?p=114#comment-22849</guid>
		<description>Great post!  Being trained as a trombonist, I&#039;ve never given Haydn much thought, but clearly I need to do so.  I work in academia in a small town, and I often take heart from Bach&#039;s letter to the Leipzig town council, &quot;Essay for a Well-Appointed Church Music.&quot;  We have it so much easier than Bach and Haydn just by living in this century... but Bach also had some of the same problems we do--lack of funding foremost among them.  And yet...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!  Being trained as a trombonist, I&#8217;ve never given Haydn much thought, but clearly I need to do so.  I work in academia in a small town, and I often take heart from Bach&#8217;s letter to the Leipzig town council, &#8220;Essay for a Well-Appointed Church Music.&#8221;  We have it so much easier than Bach and Haydn just by living in this century&#8230; but Bach also had some of the same problems we do&#8211;lack of funding foremost among them.  And yet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
